Update: 2012-01-05 01:32 AM +0630
SED-frica-r6-indx.htm
from: Online Sanskrit Dictionary , February 12, 2003 . http://sanskritdocuments.org/dict/dictall.pdf 090907
Downloaded, set in HTML, and edited by U Kyaw Tun, M.S. (I.P.S.T., U.S.A.), Daw Khin Wutyi, B.Sc., and staff of TIL Computing and Language Centre, Yangon, Myanmar. Not for sale. No copyright. Free for everyone.
index.htm | Top
SED-frica-r6-indx.htm
UKT note: Romabama has adopted
{sha.} /ʃ/ derived from
{s~ha.} '
{sa.ha.hto:}'
as a basic akshara of the fricative series:
{þa.} /θ/ स :
{þ} स्
{Sa.} /s/ ष :
{ss} ष्
{sha.} /ʃ/ श :
{sh} श्
Effective 2011-Apr-17 the Bur-Myan New Year day to meet the requirements of BEPS.
{sha.}/
{þhya.}/
{rha.} श -
sha1-182top.htm
{sha.pa.} शप -
sha1pa1-183b1-5.htm
{sha.ya.} शय
- sha1ya1-183b3-5.htm :
this file is necessary to study {ya.} and {ra.} as medial formers.
{sha} शा - sha2-185top-2.htm
{shi.}/
{þhyi.}/
{rhi.}
शि - shi1-185b3-2.htm
{shu.}/
{þhyu.}/
{rhu.}
शु - shu1-186b3-5.htm
{shé}/
{þhyé}/
{rhé}
शे - she2-188top-5.htm
sh-medials - sh-med-188b3-3.htm
[
{sh~ma.} श्म = श ् म ]
{Sa.} (fricative) ष -
ssa1-190b2-6.htm
: do not get confused with
{sa.} (palatal) च ca (cha) -
sa-064b1-2.htm
UKT: See my note on the {a.wag}-consonants aka unclassifiable fricative-sibilants and fricative-thibilants as onsets and codas.
{þän}/{thän} सं -
than02-190b4-2.htm
{þän-ya.} संय
-
than02ya1-192b1-6.htm
{þän-þka.} संस्क
= स ं स ् क = संस् क -
than02ska1-193b1-5.htm
:
- though comparable to English s-clusters or sibilant-medials, /sp/ /st/ and /sk/,
it is noteworthy that the consonant used is /θ/ and not /s/
{þa.}/{tha.}
स - tha1-194top.htm
{þa.nga.} -
tha1gna1-194b2.htm : {king:si:}
{þa.sa.} सच -
tha1sa1-195top-7.htm : {sa.} here is palatal plosive-stop.
{þa.ta.} सत -
tha1ta1-195b2-7.htm
{þa.pa.} सप -
tha1pa1-197b1-8.htm
{þa.ma} समा -
tha1ma2-198b3-5.htm
{þa.ma.},
{þa.ma},
{þa.ma:}
form a series in Bur-Myan
{þûm~} सम् -
thum-200b2-2.htm : {þûm~}-vertical
conjunct used as prefix
{þa.ra.} सर -
tha1ra1-201b2.htm
{þa.la.} सल - tha1la1-203b1-4.htm
{þa}/{tha} सा - tha2-204b1-2.htm
{þi.}/{thi.} सि - thi1-206top-2.htm
{þu.}/{thu.}
सु - thu1-207top-2.htm
{þé}/{thé} से -
the2-210top-4.htm
Note: The following has been placed under a separate indx file.
s-conjuncts : though spelled with a thibilant{þa.} /θ/, the pronunciation can only be sibilant
{sa.} /s/ to be in sync with English and other IE languages -
{z~ña.}-conjunct - zny-conj-220b2-2.htm
{þ~ka.} & {þ~ta.}-conjuncts pronounced as /ska/ & /sta/
- th-sk-conj-211top-4.htm
- th-st-conj-211top-8.htm
{þ~pa.}-conjunct स्प pronounced as /spa/ - th-sp-conj-213b1-2.htm
s-medials स्य - th-sy-med-213b4-2.htm
UKT notes :
• {a.wag}-consonants - the unclassifiable
fricative-sibilants and fricative-thibilants as onsets and codas.
See inset pix for enlarged
(as a medial) >
{sha.} (as a basic akshara)
The IPA phoneme /ʃ/ seems to present difficulties
to Bur-Myan speakers who have not been exposed to IE
(such as English). It is reflected in the difficulty
of choosing a grapheme to represent it. There were three
candidates:
{yha.},
{rha.} and
{þhya.}. MLC on 1986-Oct-01 [according to U Tun Tint, MLC editor,
{mran-ma sa-loän:paung: þût-poän-kyûm:}] finally chose
{rha.} to represent this sound in most Bur-Myan words
while retaining
{þhya.} for just a few. I feel
that the debate should be reopened and add another
candidate
{sha.} noting that the
{sa.} here is fricative and not palatal. However, since
{sha.} is going to be used as a base akshara
- not as a medial, perhaps we should extend
our innovation further following the derivation
of conjuncts in Devanagari, and draw
-->
{sha.},
-->
{shi.}, etc. I have been reluctant to suggest
until I have to deal with the sh-medials where medial-formers had to be added. [A
basic rule of akshara-medial formation requires that the inherent vowel of the
base be killed before a medial-former can be added. To meet this
requirement it is absolutely necessary to kill the inherent vowel of
,
which is not allowed unless
is a base akshara and not a medial, e.g. {sh~ma.}
श्म = श ् म
; {shya.} श्य = श ् य .
The following are thibilants for Burmese speakers, sibilants for Hindi speakers:
{þa.}
{þwa.}.
There are no sibilant-fricatives in Bur-Myan. There is only a palatal-plosive-stop
{sa.} [=
च ]. To incorporate Eng-Lat and Skt-Dev into Romabama, I need to invent one
which will be designated {Sa.} [= ष ]. However, I am reluctant to invent a
grapheme for a basic akshara unless absolutely necessary and I have decided to
use the same grapheme for both as onset-consonants:
{sa.}
(palatal-stop) [= च ], and
{Sa.}
(sibilant-fricative) [= ष ]. Please note that I have not used {ca.} [= च ] for
palatal-stop.
Since, it is absolutely necessary to have different graphemes for
coda-consonants, I have used:
{c} and
{S}. Please note again that I have used the killed {ca.} aka {c} [= च् ]
for the palatal-stop. -- UKT110321
It has been noted that modern Hindi speakers tend to use all Skt-Dev
sibilant-fricatives श = {sha.}, ष = {Sa.}, स = {sa.} as स = {sa.}. Since
what they are pronouncing as /{sa.}/ = /s/ is Pal-Myan {þa.} /θ/, it has been proposed
that I should come up with another version of Sanskrit to English dictionary
where all the Sanskrit sibilants are lumped to be comparable to Pal-Myan. --
UKT110327
Go back awag-con-note-b
End of TIL file